Comparison
Brokle vs LangSmith
Compare Brokle to LangSmith for LLM observability. Open source vs proprietary, with no vendor lock-in.
Feature comparison
See how Brokle compares to LangSmith across key features.
| Feature | Brokle | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Core Features | ||
| Trace Visualization | ||
| Prompt Management | ||
| Evaluation Framework | ||
| Cost Analytics | ||
| Playground | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Open Core (MIT Licensed) | ||
| Self-Hosting Available | ||
| No Vendor Lock-in | ||
| Community Contributions | ||
| Architecture | ||
| OpenTelemetry Native | ||
| Framework Agnostic | LangChain focused | |
| Multi-Framework Support | ||
| Integrations | ||
| LangChain | ||
| LlamaIndex | ||
| OpenAI SDK | ||
| Anthropic SDK | ||
| Enterprise | ||
| SSO (SAML/OIDC) | ||
| Data Residency Control | Limited | |
| On-Premise Deployment | ||
Why choose Brokle
Key advantages that make Brokle the better choice for your team.
- Open Core model with MIT-licensed core - self-host anywhere with optional enterprise features
- Self-host anywhere for complete data control and compliance requirements
- Framework agnostic - works with LangChain, LlamaIndex, OpenAI SDK, and any other framework
- OpenTelemetry-native architecture integrates with your existing observability stack
- No per-seat pricing - pay only for usage, not team size
- Full feature parity between open-source and cloud versions
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about switching from LangSmith to Brokle.
Ready to switch from LangSmith?
Get started with Brokle in minutes. No credit card required.
No credit card required • Self-host available